Economist proposes reviewers paste their AI prompts at the end of peer reports
paulnovosad · x · 2026-10-22
Paul Novosad notes that genAI-written referee reports are fomenting distrust—authors wonder whether the reviewer actually thought about the comments. His proposed fix: reviewers paste the prompt they used at the bottom of the report, leaving zero confusion about which ideas are the reviewer's and which are the AI's.
More from Research
- Angler: A Tiny Sequence-to-Splicing Model That Runs on a Laptop and Beats Larger Models — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-22
- Self-Amplifying RNA Programs Stem Cell Fate in One Transfection, Cell Reports Methods Paper Shows — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-22
- ETH Team Unveils 'Recordanelle', a Synthetic Organelle That Records Cell History in Nature Biotech — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-22
- The Atlas of Square Packings: 77 of 324 Cases Proved Optimal, n=12 Case Fully Proved — ctjlewis · 2026-10-22
- Paper Ships CAD Tool and Order-Ready PCB Boards, Not Just "Code Coming Soon" — _krishna_murthy · 2026-10-22
- ScreenCalib: LiDAR-camera extrinsic calibration using any ordinary display, code open-sourced — ssh4net · 2026-10-22