Fable's High Cost Drives Users to Prepare Better Context
dbreunig · x · 2026-07-04
dbreunig shared thoughts on using Anthropic's new model Fable: first, it is expensive but of extremely high quality; second, precisely because of the high cost, users put more effort into preparing the environment, reference materials, and context to ensure value for money; third, he accidentally found that Opus is actually more suitable for certain tasks. Overall, it reflects how high-priced models are changing usage patterns and workflows.
Related event: Anthropic's Fable Model Praised for Quality, Criticized for API Cost(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11