ICLR reviewer: AI-flagged missing confidence intervals is a real problem
brunofmr · x · 2026-11-07
Following his advice to ICLR authors, the reviewer adds that while AI-assisted reviewing has many shortcomings, "a broken clock is right twice a day" — e.g. AI correctly flagging that a table bolds best results without confidence intervals. Rebuttals need substance.
Related event: ICLR Reviewer Advises Authors on Handling Nitpicking and AI Reviews(2 posts)→
More from Research
- In vivo CRISPR base editing of ANGPTL3 shows durable lipid lowering, heading to trials — EricTopol · 2026-11-08
- Testing ICE Constrained Decoding: Enforce Constraints at Generation, Not After — manvigupta03 · 2026-11-08
- Near-identical neural net weights still diverge on ~3% of inputs after training — bravo_abad · 2026-11-08
- Removing negative-advantage samples drops robot zip-tie success from 86% to 60% — micoolcho · 2026-11-08
- DECIDE benchmark tests voice-agent decisions on 4,867 questions from 1,081 real calls, scoring 20 models — Aiden_Tech_Ai · 2026-11-08
- KV Cache Quantization Tested Across 35 Quants: 8-bit Is Essentially Free for Qwen3.8 27B — Hefty_Wolverine_553 · 2026-11-08