Removing negative-advantage samples drops robot zip-tie success from 86% to 60%
micoolcho · x · 2026-11-08
@fancyyzc's team proposes TRFO, showing that learning from negative experience measurably matters for robot policy training.
- Excluding negative-advantage samples cuts zip-tie success from 86% to 60%;
- Removing the trust-region constraint causes training to diverge;
- With the same collected experience, TRFO outperforms HG-DAgger and RECAP on laundry folding and zip-tie threading.
Conclusion: both the negative learning signal and constraining its strength contribute to effective policy improvement.
More from Embodied
- Figure CEO unveils F.03, the third-generation humanoid robot — adcock_brett · 2026-11-08
- Jim Fan teases 'something extraordinary' CoRL keynote at Austin on Nov 9 — DrJimFan · 2026-11-08
- PIVOT, a robot policy improvement method from deployment experience, accepted to CoRL 2026 — ZeYanjie · 2026-11-08
- Robotics roundup: Agility IPOs with $465M, Bedrock raises $600M Series C — DJiafei · 2026-11-08
- MuJoCo 4 released: Studio & Filament renderer, Deformables, Speculative Contacts — bousmalis · 2026-11-08
- Unitree factory tour sparks debate: China's robot factories are still human-powered — garrytan · 2026-11-08