Musk calls for AI labs to peer-review each other's models before release; reply says odds are nil
firstadopter · x · 2026-09-15
Investor Chris Fralic quotes Elon Musk arguing AI can be very dangerous and that major AI providers should test each other's models for safety, with peer review before major releases, since it's hard to grade your own homework. The replier flatly dismisses the idea, saying the chances of it ever happening are nil.
Related event: Musk Proposes Rival AI Labs Peer-Review Each Other's Models Before Release(8 posts)→
More from Safety
- Inference-only chip proposal would bar RL rollouts for models in training — wfithian · 2026-10-31
- Every Used Codex and Agents to Survive the Railway Credential Breach — every · 2026-10-31
- Researchers debate whether more inference compute can substitute for training compute — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-31
- OpenAI blocks weapons details for teens, adds auto-ending chats fixated on violence — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-31
- First machine-checked security proof for end-to-end x86 process execution published — banteg · 2026-10-31
- Dartmouth provost who warned of AI cheating resigns over undisclosed AI use — Ars Technica AI · 2026-10-31