Musk calls for AI labs to peer-review each other's models before release; reply says odds are nil
firstadopter · x · 2026-09-15
Investor Chris Fralic quotes Elon Musk arguing AI can be very dangerous and that major AI providers should test each other's models for safety, with peer review before major releases, since it's hard to grade your own homework. The replier flatly dismisses the idea, saying the chances of it ever happening are nil.
Related event: Musk Proposes Rival AI Labs Peer-Review Each Other's Models Before Release(8 posts)→
More from Safety
- Ramez Naam: cybersecurity needs frontier models used aggressively, not guardrails — Jsevillamol · 2026-10-31
- Bing separates AI training from AI search grounding with new site controls — OnlineInference · 2026-10-31
- OpenAI reportedly to train on users' Daybreak sessions with no opt-out — dyn___ · 2026-10-31
- Forethought: US has 9x China's AI compute, can afford to pace the frontier — willmacaskill · 2026-10-31
- unpromptedconf takeaways: security programs face forced change as reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- Reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted away, unpromptedconf speaker argues — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31