Only METR and AISI are serious AI lab safety reviewers, argues researcher
cis_female · x · 2026-09-14
cisfemale argues that executive pay and bonuses are meaningless as evidence labs care about safety—insiders hold equity and sincerely believe they will own the lightcone. She adds that vanishingly few people have both never worked with the labs and the skill to evaluate them, leaving only METR and AISI as serious independent reviewers.
More from Safety
- Inference-only chip proposal would bar RL rollouts for models in training — wfithian · 2026-10-31
- Every Used Codex and Agents to Survive the Railway Credential Breach — every · 2026-10-31
- Researchers debate whether more inference compute can substitute for training compute — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-31
- OpenAI blocks weapons details for teens, adds auto-ending chats fixated on violence — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-31
- First machine-checked security proof for end-to-end x86 process execution published — banteg · 2026-10-31
- Dartmouth provost who warned of AI cheating resigns over undisclosed AI use — Ars Technica AI · 2026-10-31