Researchers clash over why only METR and Redwood got OAI-HF incident log access
evijit · x · 2026-09-13
Researcher evijit questions the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident handling: with everyone from third parties to government agencies (CAISI, CISA) wanting log access, why were only METR and Redwood chosen, and under what criteria? Bronson Schoen counters that METR struggled enormously for even the "very insufficient" access it got, defending evaluators who left labs over evaluation gaps. The exchange exposes the missing mechanisms for incident transparency and third-party audit access at frontier labs.
More from Safety
- Dario responds to safety critics: I'd rather be mocked than see Claude used to kill — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-14
- Vitalik Buterin: Adversarial mechanism design could be AI safety's killer app — allisondman · 2026-09-14
- Oxford thesis proposes 'Attribution-Based Control' to tackle AI privacy and alignment risks — iamtrask · 2026-09-14
- We Unite or We Fight: The Long-Term Case for International AI Governance — danfaggella · 2026-09-14
- Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez: AI Needs Evidenced Standards, Not a Big-Lab Cartel — cohere · 2026-09-14
- OpenMined's 'network sourced' AI: models as orderly clients of private repositories — iamtrask · 2026-09-14