Cancelling Cursor: A Developer's Take on AI Coding Limits
speckx · hn · 2026-08-03
A developer shares their experience and reasons for cancelling their Cursor subscription.
The article notes that while AI coding tools offer initial productivity boosts, they often generate code requiring extensive manual review and fixes in complex projects, potentially introducing subtle bugs. The author argues that over-reliance on such tools can erode a developer's grasp of underlying logic, ultimately prompting a return to more traditional development workflows.
More from coding & agent
- ERP•AI launches headless SaaS with $0 seats that bills machines: $1 buys 4,000 record writes — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-16
- FDE-Gym benchmark shows huge gap on real AI delivery tasks: top model scores 0.563 — DeepLethe · 2026-10-16
- ModelClock launches free read-only MCP server to track model deprecations — zomenaro · 2026-10-16
- Vibe-coded dashboard leaked franchise financials before anyone logged in — shauntrennery · 2026-10-16
- Fintech HR built a sourcing agent on 60,000 past applicants — 30 qualified candidates in a month — G0NZ0BOY · 2026-10-16
- Orchestrating a 100-image portrait of humanity for aliens with ChatGPT, Argon and p5.brush — dx8xb · 2026-10-16