Opus 5 beats Fable on benchmarks but loses badly in real use, analyst says
petergyang · x · 2026-07-26
- The quoted analysis argues that current public benchmarks are becoming nearly useless for judging frontier models.
- It claims Opus 5 looks much weaker than Fable in real use, even though Opus wins on many benchmarks.
- The takeaway is that domain-specific evals built on private datasets may become more trustworthy than public leaderboards.
- It also suggests Anthropic may be training the 5-series differently from earlier Sonnet/Opus generations, though the post truncates before the full comparison.
More from Models
- Kimi K3.1 Pro regresses on Debate Benchmark while DeepSeek 1017 gains at lower cost — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27
- 4 Hours of LLM Startup Research Produced a Convincing but Nonsense Product Thesis — annetgriffin · 2026-10-27
- Dev argues Claude burns far more tokens than GPT models for the same coding work — haider1 · 2026-10-27
- MiniMax matches Claude Opus 4.5 in non-benchmaxxed evals, users report — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27
- Real-world math: GPT-6.1 Terra's half price is offset by 2-3x token usage, costing more than Sol — lordpuddingcup · 2026-10-27
- Fable 5.5 rumored to ship this week as partners still test — kimmonismus · 2026-10-27