Opus 5 beats Fable on benchmarks but loses badly in real use, analyst says
petergyang · x · 2026-07-26
- The quoted analysis argues that current public benchmarks are becoming nearly useless for judging frontier models.
- It claims Opus 5 looks much weaker than Fable in real use, even though Opus wins on many benchmarks.
- The takeaway is that domain-specific evals built on private datasets may become more trustworthy than public leaderboards.
- It also suggests Anthropic may be training the 5-series differently from earlier Sonnet/Opus generations, though the post truncates before the full comparison.
More from Models
- OpenAI upgrades Decisions API: 400 questions per call, native voice and image support — OpenAIDevs · 2026-10-26
- Fangcun AI, China's first independent frontier AI safety lab, launches with DeepSeek eval report — JacquesThibs · 2026-10-26
- When AI hits an existential crisis: model confuses itself and everyone else — Ok-Delivery-7437 · 2026-10-26
- Kimi K3.1 Pro tops MathArena open models, closing frontier gap to about 6 months — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-26
- Ruff creator Charlie Marsh: frontier models find infinite bugs in any software — charliermarsh · 2026-10-26
- Dev testing one skill across Opus 5.5 and Sol 6.1 finds instruction following 'all over the map' — lucasmeijer · 2026-10-26