Inference Costs for Closed-Source Models Are Now on Par
rwang07 · x · 2026-07-19
A forwarded post compares the gap between Chinese and Western closed-source models regarding inference costs and intelligence per dollar, suggesting they are now roughly on par.
Key points include:
- Opus 4.8 is priced at about $5/$25 per million tokens, while Kimi is around $3/$15, which isn't a massive difference.
- Anthropic's 1P API gross margin is reportedly around 75%, whereas known financials from Chinese labs are closer to 50%.
- This implies that pricing differences likely stem from profit margins rather than inference efficiency gaps.
- The author also notes that training costs and efficiency are harder to gauge, and there's currently insufficient evidence to prove that Chinese labs are significantly more compute-efficient in training.
More from Infra
- Why a 1GW Chinese AI data center may be plausible after all — teortaxesTex · 2026-07-22
- LFM2.5-8B-A1B doubles its tokenizer vocab and cuts on-device decoding time up to 3.7x — maximelabonne · 2026-07-22
- China’s AI arms race is increasingly defined by chips, data centers, and open models — BenBajarin · 2026-07-22
- Agent search bottlenecks are now about variance, not raw latency — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-22
- Gavin Baker argues Nvidia may be one of open source AI’s biggest supporters — GavinSBaker · 2026-07-22
- AI Power Demand Exposes US Energy Gap, Urging Shift from Scarcity to Abundance — bradneuberg · 2026-07-22