Don't Directly Compare AI Risks to the Pandemic
joshua_saxe · x · 2026-07-13
The author argues that drawing a direct analogy between the COVID-19 pandemic and an AI takeover risk is a category mistake: epidemiology and historical samples allow for probability estimates for pandemics, whereas an AI takeover is a highly hypothetical event lacking a comparable reference class.
He suggests steering the debate back to observable, regressable data: if the concern is massive AI-induced unemployment, we should look at actual job losses caused by AI; if the worry is catastrophic mismatch, we should try to estimate the incidence of relevant events rather than relying solely on abstract speculation.
Related event: Scholars Warn Against Directly Analogizing AI Risk to Pandemics(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus says LLMs still cannot really do math on their own — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- Gary Marcus says LLM math skills are like knowing only a car’s engine size — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-22
- AI may make digital work infinitely leveraged while offline life gets more human — illscience · 2026-07-22
- Better AI math could save researchers time by killing false conjectures earlier — prateekj · 2026-07-22
- AI’s economic forecasts are split by nearly a quadrillion dollars by 2035 — bittingthembits · 2026-07-22
- Open source is becoming tech’s soft power, says Kevin Xu — kevinsxu · 2026-07-22