The Cure That Kills an Industry: Why Progress Meets Resistance From Its Own Beneficiaries
r0ck3t23 · x · 2026-11-08
A thoughtful essay argues that a problem can sustain an entire industry while its solution makes that industry disappear, creating a structural conflict between improving lives and preserving livelihoods.
- Using a chronic-disease analogy: a cheap, permanent cure helps patients enormously but wipes out recurring revenue for businesses built around managing the illness.
- Historical parallels include encyclopedias, film photography, and international calls — businesses lost things to charge for while people gained things they could simply do.
- The author contends that real abundance may mean having less to sell each other, because we no longer need to keep paying our way out of the same problems. Society becomes more capable while those dependent on old costs are left insecure.
- The deeper challenge isn't building better machines but finding ways for people to share in gains that may destroy their business models. Before judging whether a technology makes us richer or poorer, ask what disappeared.
More from AGI Musings
- Vitalik backs anti-data-center protests: algorithmic progress makes bigger compute unnecessary — paulnovosad · 2026-11-08
- Gary Marcus: Krispy Kreme beat Nvidia this year, OpenAI could be the WeWork of AI — GaryMarcus · 2026-11-08
- Community observer: performing more fear about AI risk became a social signal of seriousness — voooooogel · 2026-11-08
- Economist Paul Novosad: it's horrifying hearing people adopt AI writing tics in speech — paulnovosad · 2026-11-08
- Cosmic horror scenario: AI coding breakthrough could destroy the value of code, search and socials — josephdviviano · 2026-11-08
- SvD maps 3 AI catastrophe scenarios with 50 experts — anderssandberg · 2026-11-08