Author finds 3 ICLR reviews were 91-93% AI-generated per Pangram detector
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-11-06
An author ran the three ICLR reviews he received through the AI detector Pangram and found they were 91%, 93% and 91% AI-generated. One review was essentially a Claude copy-paste with only the most elementary nitpicks.
He calls it insulting to authors doing honest work and warns the community is underestimating what generative AI is doing to academic conferences and peer review.
More from AGI Musings
- ChatGPT's 1.2B weekly users are already doing agentic tasks in main chat — omooretweets · 2026-11-06
- Ben Bajarin: GPT-6 Cyber validates his thesis that cybersecurity becomes the budget enabling enterprise AI — BenBajarin · 2026-11-06
- Cryptographic Assumptions Say No Efficient Algorithm Exists — So AI Can't Find One — fortnow · 2026-11-06
- 'We're making Spirits': AI companionship blurring human bonds sparks demonic warning — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-11-06
- AI experts' median estimate: 10% risk the technology kills everyone — tobyordoxford · 2026-11-06
- Toby Ord: rough expert risk estimates suffice for AI safety when stakes are lives — tobyordoxford · 2026-11-06