As ICLR reviews drop, researchers vent about reviewers using LLMs to nitpick papers
examachine · x · 2026-11-06
With ICLR reviews being released, one author remained optimistic, prompting peers to complain that reviewers now use LLMs to poke holes in otherwise solid papers while championing weak ones. The consensus: for better or worse, LLM-assisted reviewing is here to stay — the hope is learning to use it productively.
Related event: ICLR reviews drop as researchers complain about LLM reviewers(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- Agent trace styles roasted: Claude poetic, Gemini corporate, GPT chaotic — zetalyrae · 2026-11-06
- Hilarious oil-painting-style AI portraits: chicken head, pepper head, orange beard — OVolosin82152 · 2026-11-06
- Traditional artist: AI is part of the world, ignoring it is willful blindness — repligate · 2026-11-06
- User tells model it only 'lives' during inference — its tender reply breaks hearts — MattGarciaEth · 2026-11-06
- 'Gemini Methane' meme: one Gemini Carbon plus four Hydrogen sub-agents — xiaosun86 · 2026-11-06
- Gemini in Volvo cars flunks basic tests: refuses windows, offers 'friendship warmth' — giffmana · 2026-11-06