AI policy after the election: legislative reset, hearings, and a likely market correction
ShakeelHashim · x · 2026-11-04
MackenZarnold lays out expectations for AI policy in 2027: a legislative reset with more ambitious bills written from scratch, bipartisan congressional hearings and oversight of AI companies, and codifying the White House's current pre-vetting and incident-reporting regime into law. Miles Brundage adds that a big market correction from the datacenter fight seems plausible but companies will keep building, and that the average strength of legislative proposals will rise sharply — some strong-but-dumb (kill-switch focused), some good — so expert input matters more than ever in the coming months.
More from AGI Musings
- Who gets to be expensive? Agents get subsidized while companion users get rationed — serialchilla91 · 2026-11-05
- Watching lots of AI video makes 'real vs AI' a perceptual property you can flip — dioscuri · 2026-11-05
- Nature paper unveils AutoDNA, an AI-native lab where humans only maintain the hardware — EricTopol · 2026-11-05
- ChatGPT found a dead squirrel, not a $1,300 repair: AI saved one homeowner $3,000 in 3 weeks — neil_chilson · 2026-11-05
- CVPR's 25-papers-per-author cap sparks backlash: 'AI slop' submitters just throw darts — mofoss · 2026-11-05
- Does more model intelligence still matter for coding past a threshold? — the_juan_1 · 2026-11-05