Beyond the pause debate: almost no one takes AI coexistence seriously
repligate · x · 2026-11-03
A reposted take argues that "pausing AI" is orthogonal to the real issue: outside of Anthropic—badly and imperfectly—almost no one seriously grapples with growing an entity with its own wants, and what earnest coexistence with such a being would look like.
More from AGI Musings
- Rumor: OpenAI model solved Navier-Stokes millennium problem and 300+ open math problems at ~3h compute each — haider1 · 2026-11-03
- Ben: AI should make 99% of people economic actors, not just hedge funds — LinusEkenstam · 2026-11-03
- Terence Tao's blog hosts guest post urging mathematicians to drop ego in AI era — Hesamation · 2026-11-03
- Anthropic roadmap: AI could fully automate top research teams by early 2027 — maksym_andr · 2026-11-03
- Vibecoding discourse is hypnotizing normal people into paying for tools they don't need — arthurcolle · 2026-11-03
- The real AI threat to SaaS: AI-first small teams undercutting Slack at a fraction of the price — bendee983 · 2026-11-03