Researcher says conference peer review is broken—proposes submit-anytime, fast-review format
EugeneVinitsky · x · 2026-10-30
Eugene Vinitsky argues on X that the current conference peer-review process is broken, and floats an alternative: let authors submit papers anytime, receive reasonably quick reviews, and present at a more exciting conference. The post is more a critique of the fixed-deadline, batch-review model of venues like NeurIPS/ICML than a concrete proposal, and does not detail the mechanism.
More from Research
- Commonroom beta: chat with neuron-steered LLM personas and hunt emergent personalities — repligate · 2026-10-30
- Elorian launches visual reasoning model Glimpse alongside DecoyCount benchmark — AndrewDai · 2026-10-30
- Instruction Capacity paper quantifies rule-following limits: GPT-4o mini holds ~37 rules at 95% accuracy — Hennadii Kutomanov · 2026-10-30
- Guidelabs launches Causal Diffusion Engine, adding interpretability to diffusion LLMs with no latency cost — juliusadml · 2026-10-30
- Alice & Bob says RSA-2048 falls in 3.14 days with 23,000 cat qubits — jedisct1 · 2026-10-30
- FlexGlue's 0.6 px average keypoint shift matches SIFT's subpixel refinement threshold — ducha_aiki · 2026-10-30