DeepSeek vs Haiku pricing debunk: accounting for peak rates and token use, 1017 is 2-2.5x cheaper

teortaxesTex · x · 2026-10-28

Pushing back on the claim that Claude Haiku 5.5 (34.9% vs 28.5% on FrontierCode 2, $0.46 vs $0.52 per task) beats all Chinese models while being cheaper, teortaxesTex argues the comparison is comically unfair: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was charged peak pricing ($0.3/$1.2 per M tokens, 3x/2.4x Haiku's, active only 20% of the time), DeepSeek keeps flat pricing across 1M context while Haiku spikes 5x on longer contexts, and Haiku burns far more tokens (33.6M vs 15.3M output tokens). Factoring all three, 1017 is likely 2-2.5x cheaper in real API costs. Both ran on the Stirrup harness. Screenshots include the FrontierCode 2.0 score-vs-cost chart and per-task cost breakdowns.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →