Security researchers: nation-state offensive AI adoption lags Google, but the balance is jagged
kuza55 · x · 2026-10-23
Joshua Saxe and kuza55 debate nation-state AI capability. Saxe asks whether nation-state offensive orgs will lag Google on the adoption curve. kuza55 largely agrees but notes much capability work is outsourced, so the balance is jagged — you wouldn't want a model like GLM running your ops, yet capability gaps elsewhere may be narrower.
Related event: Researchers Debate Whether State Actors Already Use Uncensored Open Models(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- OpenAI and ICBA announce alliance to bring frontier AI cybersecurity to community banks — OpenAINewsroom · 2026-10-23
- Nathan Calyon presses Anthropic: lobbying to keep governments from stopping recursive self-improvement — wfithian · 2026-10-23
- Auth0's take on securing agentic commerce: one identity layer under four agent channels — yenkel · 2026-10-23
- AI agent attacks hit 100+ firms; researcher says natural language isn't control — mmitchell_ai · 2026-10-23
- METR reveals OpenAI could redact eval reports; researcher calls the terms 'pretty bad' — DKokotajlo · 2026-10-23
- After Mozilla compromise, Rust devs eye "remediation speed" as the next hillclimb — charliermarsh · 2026-10-23