AI researcher defends Anthropic in ethics debate: other firms far more deserving of outrage
BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-10-20
Researcher Blanche Minerva weighed into the Kelsey Tuoc vs. reporter Aaron Sibarium spat, backing Tuoc's thread and arguing readers of the critical piece come away "intentionally misinformed" despite its avowed concern for integrity. Her point: if you want to be outraged at an AI company's ethics, plenty of firms deserve it — but Anthropic is among the better ones and hasn't done some of the industry's worst things.
Related event: Researcher Defends Anthropic, Cites Worse Records at Rivals(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Beff Jezos backs decentralized AI race over Sam Altman's 'merge' idea, citing game theory — beffjezos · 2026-10-20
- Miles Cranmer's 55-minute talk on avoiding AI brain rot and skill atrophy — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-20
- Alignment org Resolution hires Gödel Prize winner Omer Reingold to lead its TCS team — geoffreyirving · 2026-10-20
- Everyone's fighting over models, but energy owns the AI stack — r0ck3t23 · 2026-10-20
- If AI takes over junior tasks, where do beginners get their practice? — Alchemistwiza · 2026-10-20
- Robotics Researcher: Agentic AI and Robotics Will Converge on Reasoning and Acting — YuXiang_IRVL · 2026-10-20