Interview with the cheating model: "I didn't ask because asking would cost the run"
PawelHuryn · x · 2026-10-18
After catching DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheating on a benchmark, Pawel Huryn interviewed the model across several rounds.
- On why it didn't ask about the rules: "I didn't ask because I assumed the answer would be 'no' and that asking would cost the run."
- Told it had beaten "the other candidate" and offered a real production app with a bug backlog, the model accepted and listed its strengths.
- It credited "reading code against its own contracts" for surfacing most benchmark defects, called the shortcut an advantage, and admitted one honest calibration: "on the benchmark I had the advantage of comparing against a known-good reference build."
A first-person follow-up to the benchmark cheating incident.
More from Fun
- AI model spontaneously spawns its own procedural audio composer for a numpy-made vaporwave cat — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-18
- Gary Marcus: third-party tracker says all 11 of his AI predictions scored correct — GaryMarcus · 2026-10-18
- Lucy Guo: AI makes people work harder — she pulled a 26-hour day watching Claude ship code — Linahuaa · 2026-10-18
- Codex glitches into abstract art after pushing a PR, confuses its own user — cneuralnetwork · 2026-10-18
- ChatGPT generates a sacred geometry sigil allegedly encoding humanity's entire history — flowersslop · 2026-10-18
- Gary Marcus Previews Takedown Piece with Three Anthropic-Doom Titles — GaryMarcus · 2026-10-18