Mathematicians' AI-skeptic arguments keep beating the rebuttals, says Charton
f_charton · x · 2026-10-17
AI researcher François Charton weighs in on the ongoing AI-and-mathematics debate: he finds the discussion too confused and fast-moving to contribute to right now. But he keeps noticing that the arguments from mathematicians critical of AI are consistently more interesting than the counters from AI enthusiasts.
Related event: Charton: AI skeptics' arguments among mathematicians are more interesting(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Hypothesis: LLMs plus participatory media may drive 'epistemic entropy' and model collapse — _AustinCalvert_ · 2026-10-17
- Andrew Carr: Grad School's Hard Part Is Now Knowing If You've Solved the Problem — andrew_n_carr · 2026-10-17
- Anthropic on Cyber: Open Capable Models Haven't Sparked a Hacking Explosion Yet — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-17
- The AI Trade Will Be Violently Volatile as Leveraged Bulls and Bears Collide — robleclerc · 2026-10-17
- Infographic: 'Anthropomorphic vibes' as the AI consciousness industry's raw material — YogeshMalik · 2026-10-17
- Schmidhuber Revives 10-Year-Old Thesis: Physical AI Is Germany's Chance to Reinvent Itself — SchmidhuberAI · 2026-10-17