AI governance veteran: 'We thought we had more time. We didn't' — the window for IVO action is open
ghadfield · x · 2026-10-09
The author reflects on nearly a decade in AI governance, first building regulatory markets and now running Fathom around the IVO (International Verification Organization) model. Key point: everyone assumed there was more time to prepare — there wasn't. But a concrete, shovel-ready governance mechanism now exists, and he urges governments to act on it while the window is still open.
More from AGI Musings
- SubDGuide: modeler-inspired agentic workflow for mesh-to-SubD reconstruction — ssh4net · 2026-10-10
- MIT paper: AGI's binding constraint is human verification bandwidth, not intelligence — Afinetheorem · 2026-10-10
- Jay Kreps predicts humans won't be needed for math in 3 years; peers push back — JosephJacks_ · 2026-10-10
- "Solving it kills the grants": AI in math rekindles academia critique — _AustinCalvert_ · 2026-10-10
- "Math belongs to taxpayers": AI solving math sparks ownership debate — _AustinCalvert_ · 2026-10-10
- OpenAI's Noam Brown Delivers Concluding Remarks on AI Alignment at COLM 2026 — erichorvitz · 2026-10-10