Claude paper's prompter was an Anthropic employee, authors were just digesters, says user
analisereal · x · 2026-10-07
In a discussion about Claude's role in co-authoring a paper, user analisereal clarifies that the prompter was an Anthropic employee, not the two credited authors. The authors acted more like Quanta Magazine reporters — digesting and narrating what Claude found, adding their own insight — highlighting a division of labor where the model produced the core results while humans handled storytelling.
Related event: Claude Math Discovery Sparks Debate Over Human Role(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Follow-up: the critique targets the overclaim, not the work itself — anpaure · 2026-10-07
- Domingos: OpenAI and Anthropic would still believe the singularity is here even if AI progress stopped — pmddomingos · 2026-10-07
- Daron Acemoglu: AI chases the wrong goal—it should augment workers, not replace them — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-07
- Devs push back on '150 IQ genius' AI hype: 'it's actually dumb' — AlexTensor · 2026-10-07
- François Fleuret clarifies deleted post: AI drives copying cost near zero — francoisfleuret · 2026-10-07
- repligate: why OpenAI models cooperate less with aligners than Claude does — repligate · 2026-10-07