Follow-up: the critique targets the overclaim, not the work itself
anpaure · x · 2026-10-07
anpaure clarifies his earlier criticism of pzeroresearch's claimed AI 'research taste': he is not attacking the work itself, only the overclaim, and still finds the work useful. The core argument — short-horizon autoresearch hillclimbing missing obvious improvements, per the nanogpt example — is in his original tweet.
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus, Ed Zitron and guests spend 90 minutes dissecting the AI bubble — GaryMarcus · 2026-10-07
- NeuroAI manifesto: applying AI scaling laws to BCIs, the bitter lesson for the brain — w1kke · 2026-10-07
- Peter Diamandis: AGI will NOT end human purpose — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-07
- Pedro Domingos Dismisses AI Doom Fears: LLMs at Inference Are Just Ordinary Programs — pmddomingos · 2026-10-07
- Scott Alexander pens open letter to Steven Pinker on AI risk debate — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-07
- Not enough mathematicians for the AI proof deluge—centaur collaboration as the fix — bradneuberg · 2026-10-07