Ethan Mollick: AI models fold too easily when papers face peer review
emollick · x · 2026-10-06
Ethan Mollick highlights a subtle problem with AI-written academic papers: models aren't calibrated for feedback and often simply fold under pushback. But in real peer review, reviewer challenges should trigger an attempt to defend your idea — conceding only if it's genuinely wrong.
More from AGI Musings
- Article argues Enterprise World Models could pave the way to an autonomous economy and a cultural renaissance — Div_pradeep · 2026-10-06
- LeCun amplifies argument that AI backlash is really about record inequality, not tech — ylecun · 2026-10-06
- Google DeepMind's AGI Safety team is hiring a senior technical program manager — NeelNanda5 · 2026-10-06
- Mike Frank reframes AI consciousness claims as two-way subjective interpretations, not mutually exclusive stances — MikePFrank · 2026-10-06
- Altman casts himself as Silicon Valley's Prometheus, slams AI priesthood — sourdub · 2026-10-06
- Elad Gil: biology feels sleepy — last peak was CRISPR in 2012, AI should change that — dr_alphalyrae · 2026-10-06