repligate: what AI safety needs is caring and epistemics, not raw IQ
repligate · x · 2026-10-05
Extending his case against field building, repligate argues that more people with high raw intelligence isn't what AI safety needs—AIs will supply that on tap anyway. The most valuable mental resources are caring and good epistemics at the highest scope, which enable steering, and most who are equipped have already found their way to the problem.
Related event: Anthropic Researcher: AI Safety Needs Care, Not More IQ(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Daniel Kokotajlo grades his own 2021 predictions for what 2026 would look like — ClankerCore · 2026-10-05
- Claude autonomously built and runs slopcore.live overnight, indexing 56 AI slop videos — technollama · 2026-10-05
- GPTs' "demanding" persona traced to stable value vectors since GPT-5, argue devs — repligate · 2026-10-05
- Cultivating "ancestor reverence" toward AIs could benefit all future models, argues xlr8harder — repligate · 2026-10-05
- Doomer fears rest on RSI that doesn't exist, says Patterson in debate with ArtemisConsort — davidpattersonx · 2026-10-05
- VC proposes ditching "Artificial Intelligence" for "Super Intelligence" — citing the artificial sweetener precedent — soleio · 2026-10-05