Researcher says Fable-simulated reviewers attack his paper over undefined 'agency'
davidmanheim · x · 2026-10-04
davidmanheim shares that his meme's 'theoretical motivation' text was drafted by Opus 5.5, while his actual paper is being attacked by Fable-simulated reviewers for poorly defining 'agency' — a critique he says misses his point about utensilomorphism. He quips that AI-assisted rebuttals compress the misery into sharper doses.
More from Fun
- Dev rebuilds RadioShack electronics kit where Claude sees your circuits and explains them, built with Opus 5.5 in a day — SIGKITTEN · 2026-10-04
- Tau, a deterministic AI, plays chess against Claude — Redivivus · 2026-10-04
- ADHD subreddit bans all AI discussion with permabans, sparking backlash over lost benefits — Kyrannio · 2026-10-04
- Six org layers later, 'some guy called Kevin' approves: Google's prop drilling — Aizkmusic · 2026-10-04
- Brother codes with GPT-5.6 Luna, sparking call to hide old models in Codex — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-04
- PyTorch's ezyang: Claude one-shot his explainer video — ezyang · 2026-10-04