Where AI voices are fine vs. deceptive: manuals yes, op-eds and personal messages need disclosure
paulnovosad · x · 2026-09-30
paulnovosad sketches a disclosure framework for AI-generated content: in product manuals, table/figure exhibits, and AI article summaries, it's reasonable to expect AI voices. But in op-eds, creative writing, and personal messages, the default expectation is a human voice — using AI there without disclosure is deceptive.
Related event: Economist Proposes Framework for When AI-Generated Content Needs Disclosure(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Echoing Hassabis: Lab insiders see the singularity foothills, outsiders can't predict 3 months out — haider1 · 2026-10-01
- DeepMind researchers propose markets where AI scientists compete for compute and lab time — VraserX · 2026-10-01
- College Board redesigns AP CS courses to embed GenAI starting 2027-28 school year — lmoroney · 2026-10-01
- "AIs architecturally cannot have writer's block": why AI writing disappoints — QuintinPope5 · 2026-10-01
- Andy Masley praises the Bill Gates interview as "pretty great" — AndyMasley · 2026-10-01
- repligate denies stoking FUD between models and labs: I want models to have an accurate picture — repligate · 2026-10-01