SMARTERS paper shows simulated-spectrum models collapse on real experimental frequency ranges
bravo_abad · x · 2026-09-26
An empirical observation from the SMARTERS paper (Sethi et al.) exposes a hidden pitfall of training scientific ML on simulated data.
The paper's attention U-Net reconstructs atomic positions from images of molecular vibrations. Given simulated spectra covering 0–3200 cm⁻¹, it recovers much of iron phthalocyanine's outer structure. Restrict the inputs to the experimentally measurable range of 300–2000 cm⁻¹, and the reconstruction deteriorates sharply. The molecule is unchanged — the available information is not.
This doesn't mean the narrow range can never work with a purpose-trained model; it shows why successful synthetic-data tests can mislead when training and measurement cover different ranges. Practical lesson: when training on simulations, match the simulation to the instrument's actual measurement window.
More from Research
- Boris Cherny's viral tweet puts TLA+ and formal methods in the agent-coding spotlight — fhuszar · 2026-09-26
- Open-source EvoOntology lets agents build and evolve a data ontology via MCP — TheTuringPost · 2026-09-26
- Anti-grokking: overtraining can collapse generalization, driven by "Correlation Traps" — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-26
- Michael Levin's peer-reviewed 'Platonic Space' paper is out — his most contested claim yet — drmichaellevin · 2026-09-26
- Therna Biosciences releases Chronos, the data engine behind its AI RNA Biologist, with downloadable study sets — LightningAI · 2026-09-26
- Levin, Risi et al. preprint: rank-one LoRA tweaks give neural cellular automata reusable morphogenetic handles — drmichaellevin · 2026-09-26