"Solving Navier-Stokes took intelligence": debate over defining AI intelligence
austinc3301 · x · 2026-09-22
- Responding to claims that talk of AI intelligence is hype, austinc3301 argues that AI solving the Navier-Stokes problem clearly required intelligence.
- He adds that any definition of intelligence excluding such an obvious example is neither helpful nor predictive.
Related event: OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim sparks debate over math validity and hype(9 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Professor Predicts AI Will Split Universities Into Industrial Research and Boutique Teaching — prof_g · 2026-09-22
- Are there now more builders than buyers for vibe-coded apps? — nikvassev · 2026-09-22
- Agent Tackles Open Ramsey Theory Problem, Drains MacBook Pro Battery Running Optimization — tdhopper · 2026-09-22
- From souls to machine mysticism: the circular irony in AI intelligence debates — keenanisalive · 2026-09-22
- Technical SEO is Dead* — Ahrefs' Patrick Stox on agents and search — gaganghotra_ · 2026-09-22
- GenAI Adoption Tracker: 61.8% of US Adults Use AI, Work Adoption Hit in 1/3 the Time of PCs — robseamans · 2026-09-22