EA Community Erupts Over Philosopher's Argument That Insect Lives May Be Net Negative
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-20
A fresh ethical fight is roiling the EA/effective altruist community. Matthew Adelstein published an argument critics say undermines human value, and has previously expressed a preference to destroy insects en masse because their lives are net negative.
- Tracewoodgrains responded publicly that the position is "morally monstrous" and badly timed, urging EAs to reject it directly rather than only at the meta level, warning it could still persuade community members.
- teortaxesTex shared the reply approvingly, framing it as the right way to attack utilitarians: "you need to know them to strike them," unlike juvenile jabs about bugs or personal quirks.
The clash touches core EA tensions: utilitarian value commensurability, insect welfare, and AI alignment priorities.
More from AGI Musings
- Andreessen: Agents Are Entering Enterprises as Chaos, Just Like PCs and Spreadsheets Did — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-11-04
- 1000+ mathematicians sign pledge to shun AI companies and models — Shesawthat · 2026-11-04
- Von Neumann meme: "You don't have to be responsible for the world that you're in" — akbirthko · 2026-11-04
- Joscha Bach on the dream chocolate that stopped being real — Machine Learning Street Talk · 2026-11-04
- François Chollet: modeling brain wiring as an engineering problem constrained by genome size and time — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-11-04
- Most US Couples Now Meet in a Data Centre, Doubling Office Matches — menhguin · 2026-11-04