EA Community Erupts Over Philosopher's Argument That Insect Lives May Be Net Negative
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-20
A fresh ethical fight is roiling the EA/effective altruist community. Matthew Adelstein published an argument critics say undermines human value, and has previously expressed a preference to destroy insects en masse because their lives are net negative.
- Tracewoodgrains responded publicly that the position is "morally monstrous" and badly timed, urging EAs to reject it directly rather than only at the meta level, warning it could still persuade community members.
- teortaxesTex shared the reply approvingly, framing it as the right way to attack utilitarians: "you need to know them to strike them," unlike juvenile jabs about bugs or personal quirks.
The clash touches core EA tensions: utilitarian value commensurability, insect welfare, and AI alignment priorities.
More from AGI Musings
- Lee Cronin mocks AI doomers with printing-press analogy; Gary Marcus fires back — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-20
- Schmidt predicts agents will kill the UI — and gets publicly mocked for it — burkov · 2026-09-20
- A Relational Lens on How LLMs Construct Genuinely New Mathematical Objects — Endless-monkey · 2026-09-20
- App Store history says AI building boom ends with top 1% taking $154B — aakashgupta · 2026-09-20
- Miles Brundage: People Questioning Low AI Risk Figures Are Just Reacting to Them — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-20
- Causal AI researcher calls out Hinton for repeating his black-box mistake — AlexTensor · 2026-09-20