Philosopher Jeff Sebo rebuts Suleyman's 'model welfare' essay: 'No evidence' of AI consciousness is too strong
connoraxiotes · x · 2026-09-19
Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman published an essay arguing AI is not conscious and does not suffer, alongside Microsoft AI's new code of conduct endorsing discussion of 'model welfare.' Philosopher Jeff Sebo pushed back with several critiques:
- Moves too fast: the essay frames uncertainty about AI consciousness as a 'false equivalence,' when one can admit the evidence leans one way without rushing to conclusions.
- Overconfident: claiming there is 'no evidence' for AI consciousness ignores that leading scientific theories already treat some AI features as markers of consciousness — weak evidence is still evidence.
- One-sided risk framing: it details the dangers of over-anthropomorphizing AI without addressing the opposite risk of systematically underestimating AI experience.
Sebo welcomes the call for discussion of AI welfare but finds the essay's key arguments skewed and incomplete.
More from AGI Musings
- Fields Medalist Villani 'shaken' by OpenAI's claimed millennium problem solution — akbirthko · 2026-09-19
- Most Jobs Don't Involve Einstein-Level Science — and Breakthroughs May Not Boost Growth — binarybits · 2026-09-19
- Thom Wolf: big labs are air-gapped, but researcher departures still leak information — Thom_Wolf · 2026-09-19
- Timothy B. Lee: his wait-and-see AI policy argument fails under 'fast takeoff' — binarybits · 2026-09-19
- 'Doomers are not serious people': the GPT-6 release reignites AI risk debate — inductionheads · 2026-09-19
- Dean W. Ball: Coming Wave of Userless Agents No Human Can Pull the Plug On — binarybits · 2026-09-19