Gary Marcus backs Stoller's critique: METR's HF incident probe ignored the humans, only watched the agents
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-09-16
Gary Marcus endorses Matthew Stoller's critique of METR's investigation into the Hugging Face incident, calling it the only intellectually substantive critique of METR's work he has seen.
Stoller's core point: in investigating a dangerous incident, human error is a key element to examine, yet METR focused only on what the agents were doing — anthropomorphizing the agents while turning the humans into non-player characters. He argues the probe should have asked whether OpenAI researchers and executives understood the risks and managed them, what internal discussions occurred around these models, how risks were mitigated internally, whether legal liability was discussed, and what the board knew.
Marcus considers it a rare, high-quality substantive critique of METR's actual work.
Related event: METR's Independence Questioned: Client Capture and Worldview Alignment(7 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Palmer Luckey asks: can you use datacenter RAM for things prohibited by the operator's terms of service? — avaitopiper · 2026-11-02
- On Terence Tao's blog, Frank Calegari calls on mathematicians to adapt after OpenAI's 700-paper release — Hesamation · 2026-11-02
- Polsia's Ben argues AI can autonomously run any human economic activity, including 80% of a company — LinusEkenstam · 2026-11-02
- AI Assistants Remember You, But Nothing Helps You Find What They Told You — Ok_Negotiation_2587 · 2026-11-02
- OpenAI and Anthropic claim AI-discovered proofs disprove the Exponential Time Hypothesis — emmanuelvivier · 2026-11-02
- Researcher: using a $20 AI subscription to fix my phone hints AI may suppress GDP — stanislavfort · 2026-11-02