grok-4.6 code review burns ~40% quota in one 14-minute task, user reports
bytebot · x · 2026-09-15
A user reports running a code review with grok-4.6 (medium) via a Cursor-style tool: the task took 14m28s and consumed roughly 40% of their quota, suggesting the model is very quota-hungry. They speculate that quota terms may be more generous on Cursor's side of Grok.
More from Models
- OpenAI launches ChatGPT gift cards and cuts desktop voice costs ~60% — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-15
- Snapcompact renders context as pixel-font bitmaps, cutting LLM input costs ~2x — brandon_galang · 2026-09-15
- Artificial Analysis publishes full GPT-Live-1 Speech to Speech comparison — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-09-15
- GPT-Live-1 costs $4.47-$5.83 per audio hour, far below GPT-Realtime-2.1 — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-09-15
- Speech Arena: GPT-Live-1 ranks #3-4, Grok leads task success at 94.6% — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-09-15
- OpenAI's GPT-Live-1 debuts at #1 on Speech-to-Speech Index with 81.5, beating Grok Voice — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-09-15