Ex-OpenAI researcher: labs will never agree on one third-party safety evaluator
suchenzang · x · 2026-09-13
Former OpenAI researcher suchenzang reiterates her view that labs place near-zero probability on agreeing to a single 'third-party safety evaluator', because such a body would need to simultaneously be competent enough to run real frontier evals (not repackage existing ones), financially independent of existing labs, and have the backbone to speak up when things go wrong. She adds the cryptic hint 'keyword: embedded' pointing at related news.
More from Models
- Qwenputer: a full RISC-V CPU inside Qwen3.5-4B weights, running C in forward passes — armand_ruiz · 2026-10-31
- OpenAI blocks weapons details for teens, adds auto-ending chats fixated on violence — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-31
- Granite Switch 4.1.1 ships: update models like you update software — krvarshney · 2026-10-31
- Mistral Open-Sources Le Chonk: Top Open Model on FrontierCode, Cyberdefense-Tested by CrowdStrike and Cloudflare — tensorqt · 2026-10-31
- Stanford CS336 Lecture Explains Why DPO Compares Against a Reference, Not Two Current Probabilities — stanfordnlp · 2026-10-31
- ik_llama.cpp PR #2808 adds native runtime for China Telecom's Xing4.0-29B-A4B MoE with mHC and MLA — Any_Bus9205 · 2026-10-31