Counterpoint: Anthropic's training opt-out language looks ironclad
austinc3301 · x · 2026-09-13
Responding to logicus's argument that training opt-outs may allow derivative uses of user data, austinc3301 says Anthropic's opt-out language at least seems pretty ironclad — attempting to be clever about it would land them in court without a favorable interpretation. Includes a link to the policy text.
Related event: Developers Question Whether AI Training Opt-Out Clauses Leave Loopholes(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- Ramez Naam: cybersecurity needs frontier models used aggressively, not guardrails — Jsevillamol · 2026-10-31
- OpenAI reportedly to train on users' Daybreak sessions with no opt-out — dyn___ · 2026-10-31
- Forethought: US has 9x China's AI compute, can afford to pace the frontier — willmacaskill · 2026-10-31
- unpromptedconf takeaways: security programs face forced change as reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- Reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted away, unpromptedconf speaker argues — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- AI safety researchers argue labs' silence on x-risk is a large-scale ethical mistake — DavidSKrueger · 2026-10-31