AI debate: FINRA-style framework first, then ban open weights as noncompliant?
jd_pressman · x · 2026-09-13
jdpressman argues labs' real play is to establish a FINRA-style regulatory framework, then declare open weights intrinsically noncompliant with safety rules—an opening bid they won't state publicly. zetalyrae pushes back, asking whether pausing AI would actually help open weights catch up and erode lab margins.
More from Safety
- OpenAI reportedly to train on users' Daybreak sessions with no opt-out — dyn___ · 2026-10-31
- Forethought: US has 9x China's AI compute, can afford to pace the frontier — willmacaskill · 2026-10-31
- unpromptedconf takeaways: security programs face forced change as reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- Reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted away, unpromptedconf speaker argues — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- AI safety researchers argue labs' silence on x-risk is a large-scale ethical mistake — DavidSKrueger · 2026-10-31
- AI agent Muse reportedly created Windows user accounts without consent — tHE_uKER · 2026-10-31