Beyond Slowdown vs. Acceleration: A 'Group C' Case for AI Safety Without Personal Attacks
tristanbob · x · 2026-09-13
The author argues both AI camps are wrong: Group A says slowing down AI cedes advantage to adversaries and benefits self-interested slowdown advocates; Group B says existential risk trumps all costs. He proposes Group C—both have valid points, and we must avoid personal attacks and assumed bad faith, uniting to safely wield AI's power.
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI alignment researcher: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing — jachiam0 · 2026-09-13
- METR brings in Redwood staff for independent investigation of Anthropic alignment incidents — Jsevillamol · 2026-09-13
- What's a rogue AI agent's comparative advantage against hyperscalers printing cheaper tokens? — EigenGender · 2026-09-13
- Dario Amodei's new essay calls to pace the frontier; Anthropic opens systems to third-party evaluators — EvanHub · 2026-09-13
- MIT publishes official AI and Education report with eight guiding principles — alex_verem · 2026-09-13
- MIT report: 46% of undergrads use LLMs daily, 90% worry about overreliance — alex_verem · 2026-09-13