OpenAI alignment researcher: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing
jachiam0 · x · 2026-09-13
Responding to @tszzl's claim that controlling superintelligent models is mostly a natural science problem rather than a matter of pacing agreements, OpenAI alignment researcher @jachiam0 agrees, adding that superintelligent models may be only one factor—and perhaps not the largest—in determining long-term outcomes.
Related event: OpenAI researcher: taming superintelligence is science, not pacing deals(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic alum: unexpected AI problem-solving plus real misalignment cases make the case to slow down — Flomerboy · 2026-09-13
- Under deep uncertainty, charging ahead unchanged makes no sense, argues Flomerboy — Flomerboy · 2026-09-13
- 'We need incredible safeguards in 5-8 years or millions, maybe billions will die' — JacquesThibs · 2026-09-13
- Researchers Debate Whether Trying to Control Superintelligence Backfires — JacquesThibs · 2026-09-13
- Weekly Links: skeptical take on Anthropic/OpenAI pacing essays — compute caps miss the real problem — njyx · 2026-09-13
- Open R&D posture protects frontier labs from replacement but kills challengers — JoshPurtell · 2026-09-13