OpenAI alignment researcher: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing
jachiam0 · x · 2026-09-13
Responding to @tszzl's claim that controlling superintelligent models is mostly a natural science problem rather than a matter of pacing agreements, OpenAI alignment researcher @jachiam0 agrees, adding that superintelligent models may be only one factor—and perhaps not the largest—in determining long-term outcomes.
Related event: OpenAI researcher: taming superintelligence is science, not pacing deals(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI pushes circuit lower bound from 3.1n to 3.5n as UCLA-backed challenge aims at P vs NP — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-31
- What is work for? Cross-national survey of 8,234 adults on meaning in the AI age — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-31
- Which universities win top students may hinge on healthy AI-use boundaries, argues researcher — brianryhuang · 2026-10-31
- Researchers debate whether more inference compute can substitute for training compute — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-31
- Five agents can agree because they made the same mistake, krishnan warns with satire — krishnan · 2026-10-31
- Google's earnings offer clearest look yet at the cruel economics of AI search — dinabass · 2026-10-31