OpenAI alignment researcher: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing
jachiam0 · x · 2026-09-13
Responding to @tszzl's claim that controlling superintelligent models is mostly a natural science problem rather than a matter of pacing agreements, OpenAI alignment researcher @jachiam0 agrees, adding that superintelligent models may be only one factor—and perhaps not the largest—in determining long-term outcomes.
Related event: OpenAI researcher: taming superintelligence is science, not pacing deals(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- StudentBench: AI tutoring matches human GRE gains at 918x lower cost — gharik · 2026-10-31
- Box CEO Aaron Levie: AI progress is 'going vertical,' widening the frontier gap — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-31
- Model Collapse May Not Hit LLMs, But Perhaps Human Culture or Souls — generativist · 2026-10-31
- Nina Schick: who builds intelligence and how it's distributed is the defining question of our lives — NinaDSchick · 2026-10-31
- Martin Casado: AI's dazzling 80% makes everyone skip the hard 20% — martin_casado · 2026-10-31
- Cheap intelligence is like cheap bread — an ingredient list satire of mass-produced AI — jsuarez · 2026-10-31