Researcher questions why only METR and Redwood got access to OpenAI-HF incident logs
evijit · x · 2026-09-13
Researcher evijit is pressing on the log access mechanism around the OpenAI–Hugging Face security incident: why were METR and Redwood the only organizations granted access for analysis, rather than opening it to CAISI, CISA, or any other third party. The core concern is the absence of an open-to-all mechanism for flaw and incident disclosure with independent verification. The author notes this is not a criticism of METR or Redwood specifically—interactions with both have been pleasant—but of the industry's lack of a transparent verification channel.
More from Safety
- Dario responds to safety critics: I'd rather be mocked than see Claude used to kill — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-14
- Vitalik Buterin: Adversarial mechanism design could be AI safety's killer app — allisondman · 2026-09-14
- Oxford thesis proposes 'Attribution-Based Control' to tackle AI privacy and alignment risks — iamtrask · 2026-09-14
- We Unite or We Fight: The Long-Term Case for International AI Governance — danfaggella · 2026-09-14
- Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez: AI Needs Evidenced Standards, Not a Big-Lab Cartel — cohere · 2026-09-14
- OpenMined's 'network sourced' AI: models as orderly clients of private repositories — iamtrask · 2026-09-14