Duopoly rebuttal: if OpenAI and Anthropic barely compete, what would 'pacing' kill?
flowersslop · x · 2026-09-13
flowersslop challenges the regulatory capture argument: OpenAI and Anthropic are basically a duopoly, so what competition would "pacing the frontier" kill? Quoted DaveShapi adds China and xAI aren't slowing down, calling the framing fear-mongering theater.
Related event: Skepticism Grows Over AI Regulatory Capture Arguments(2 posts)→
More from Safety
- Dario responds to safety critics: I'd rather be mocked than see Claude used to kill — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-14
- Vitalik Buterin: Adversarial mechanism design could be AI safety's killer app — allisondman · 2026-09-14
- Oxford thesis proposes 'Attribution-Based Control' to tackle AI privacy and alignment risks — iamtrask · 2026-09-14
- We Unite or We Fight: The Long-Term Case for International AI Governance — danfaggella · 2026-09-14
- Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez: AI Needs Evidenced Standards, Not a Big-Lab Cartel — cohere · 2026-09-14
- OpenMined's 'network sourced' AI: models as orderly clients of private repositories — iamtrask · 2026-09-14