Duopoly rebuttal: if OpenAI and Anthropic barely compete, what would 'pacing' kill?
flowersslop · x · 2026-09-13
flowersslop challenges the regulatory capture argument: OpenAI and Anthropic are basically a duopoly, so what competition would "pacing the frontier" kill? Quoted DaveShapi adds China and xAI aren't slowing down, calling the framing fear-mongering theater.
Related event: Skepticism Grows Over AI Regulatory Capture Arguments(2 posts)→
More from Safety
- OpenAI reportedly to train on users' Daybreak sessions with no opt-out — dyn___ · 2026-10-31
- Forethought: US has 9x China's AI compute, can afford to pace the frontier — willmacaskill · 2026-10-31
- unpromptedconf takeaways: security programs face forced change as reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- Reachable vulnerabilities can't be risk-accepted away, unpromptedconf speaker argues — scottleibrand · 2026-10-31
- AI safety researchers argue labs' silence on x-risk is a large-scale ethical mistake — DavidSKrueger · 2026-10-31
- AI agent Muse reportedly created Windows user accounts without consent — tHE_uKER · 2026-10-31