Dogme 95 for Writing: Why AI-Edited Text Should Be 0%, Not '3-5% Is Fine'
paulnovosad · x · 2026-09-11
A debate over where to draw the line on banning AI in writing: one side cites the Pangram detector scoring AI-copy-edited op-eds at 3-5%, asking if that's too strict. The counter: 0% means 0%. Like Von Trier's Dogme 95 vow to use zero post-production trickery — not just where it seemed fine — the whole point of a dogma is to take the slippery slope out of the equation.
Related event: Debate Over Academic AI Writing Policies: Zero Tolerance or Leeway(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- A classical transhumanist asks why people prefer an AGI god over self-enhancement — zetalyrae · 2026-09-11
- Models went from grade-school math to hard problems in 2 years — and faster gains are coming — felixrieseberg · 2026-09-11
- Zuckerberg: every business will have its own AI, like a website or email address — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-11
- 'AI is the only risk that could realistically kill me soon,' researcher argues on X — JMannhart · 2026-09-11
- Users Want Deliverables, Not Answers: The Real Shift From Chatbots to Agents — Berseker907 · 2026-09-11
- Matt Shumer's 'Something Big Is Happening' essay quietly hit nearly 90M views — mattshumer_ · 2026-09-11