ZODIAC Cuts 95% Hausdorff Error Up to 22% on Hardest Spinal Ultrasound Cases
maier_ak · x · 2026-09-08
Tested on 2 phantoms and 6 volunteers (3 hard cases), ZODIAC matched supervised methods on clean data and cut 95% Hausdorff error by up to 22% on the hardest cases while reducing variability by 80%. Caveats: validated on three scanners only, F1 dropped 15%, and all volunteers had healthy spines.
More from Research
- MissionReport benchmark: only 3 of 540 AI-generated government reports pass all criteria — Exp_Mark · 2026-10-27
- Finch 1: a geospatial foundation model trained on imagery from 50+ sensors — Scobleizer · 2026-10-27
- Skyfall AI's SKY-001 world model turns sketches into CAD builds in 3.9s, vs 199s for GPT-6 Astra — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-27
- Physicists Let AI Pick Its Own Problem—It Wrote a Publishable Paper in 2 Hours — burny_tech · 2026-10-27
- Researcher flags unresolved data transparency issues in compositionality evals — najoungkim · 2026-10-27
- Separate Forms from Estimators: Why Steer by Difference of Means When You Can Use SGD? — johnhewtt · 2026-10-27