Salib clarifies: rogue AI risk and social-science framings are distinct claims
petersalib · x · 2026-09-08
Wrapping the debate, petersalib clarifies: one can disagree that rogue AI, rogue labs, or rogue governments using AI are big risks modulated by capability progress — but that is a distinct claim from 'we can use social science to understand AI,' which he agrees with. The thread narrows to a dispute over claim boundaries rather than substance.
More from Safety
- We Have a Year to Fix Security Everywhere: Dev Warns AI Is Outpacing Defenses — saikatsg · 2026-09-08
- Gary Marcus amplifies rebuttal: 'We are not in the AGI era' as OpenAI's Brockman touts an essay — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-08
- Cybercriminals rarely go to jail — AI will 100x attacks, argues founder — bindureddy · 2026-09-08
- Model AI companies as impersonal organisms — govern them with rules, not persuasion — joshua_saxe · 2026-09-08
- A screensaver project to fight LG smart TVs' spying and forced ads — taylorfinley · 2026-09-08
- Apollo Research CEO: 2026 looks like a sad year for AGI safety so far — kalladomcdowell · 2026-09-08