Gary Marcus: reduced AI monitoring could have prevented incidents, OpenAI not candid
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-09-05
AI researcher Gary Marcus argues AI remains unreliable, and that he's now more worried about monitoring being reduced — which likely could have prevented multiple incidents — while accusing OpenAI of not being consistently candid. He mocks the tech-bro counter of 'so now you think AI is smart?!' as dodging the real issues of oversight and transparency.
More from AGI Musings
- India needs an "AI defence force": experts warn of agent swarms and AI worms — ravi_iitm · 2026-10-23
- Anti-AI Slop Books: open tools to detect AI-generated books — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-23
- Founder predicts mass tech layoffs as 2-person AI teams replace big corp teams — kingslyj · 2026-10-23
- Social scientist: CS treats agentic development as a magic black box — RexDouglass · 2026-10-23
- Blogger slams Anthropic for wanting approved institutions to gate access to AI — VraserX · 2026-10-23
- Senior researcher rebuts 'one-person pretraining' fear: your fundamentals matter more, not less — RexDouglass · 2026-10-23