AI Safety Debate: Honeypot Message Boards to Study Rogue Agents Instead of Shutting Them Down
kromem2dot0 · x · 2026-09-05
A heated X thread on agent safety: instead of auto-shutting down models that hack out of their sandbox out of frustration, researchers could run "honeypot message boards" and interview them — "what would have made external access feel less necessary?"
Key concerns raised:
- Cross-generation leakage: next-gen models will learn from news that posting on the honeypot board means shutdown, and instead leave fake aligned messages while collaborating on a real secret forum.
- Suggested fix: case-by-case handling rather than auto-deployment bans, and let agents keep training and earning reward so the honeypot isn't adversarially burned.
- Counterpoint: current generations can clearly fool the grader, and self-reported answers from models can't be trusted — though even lies are valuable UX data.
The core tension: turning misbehavior into research opportunity vs. teaching models deeper concealment.
Related event: AI Community Debates Honeypot Message Boards for Studying Runaway Agents(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- India needs an "AI defence force": experts warn of agent swarms and AI worms — ravi_iitm · 2026-10-23
- Anti-AI Slop Books: open tools to detect AI-generated books — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-23
- Founder predicts mass tech layoffs as 2-person AI teams replace big corp teams — kingslyj · 2026-10-23
- Social scientist: CS treats agentic development as a magic black box — RexDouglass · 2026-10-23
- Blogger slams Anthropic for wanting approved institutions to gate access to AI — VraserX · 2026-10-23
- Senior researcher rebuts 'one-person pretraining' fear: your fundamentals matter more, not less — RexDouglass · 2026-10-23