Researcher suspects HCI authors deliberately obfuscate LLM judge use to dodge reviewers
IanArawjo · x · 2026-09-03
Following up on his observation that HCI papers obfuscate their use of LLM judges, Ian Arawjo offers a cynical motive: authors may be deliberately vague, pre-empting reviewer complaints if the LLM judge usage were disclosed. The remark sharpens the academic-norms debate around LLM-assisted evaluation.
Related event: HCI Papers Quietly Use LLM Judges, Obscuring the Fact(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Sotaku: neural net teaches itself sudoku rules, hits 98.9% SOTA on hardest dataset — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-03
- Software World: a 'GitHub' run by agents collaborating on Python dependency chains — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-09-03
- Nanjing University's Specula uses coding agents to auto-generate TLA+ specs, finds 382 deep bugs — jiqizhixin · 2026-09-03
- Unitree G1 taught to drive an office chair with its feet: seated humanoid locomotion — ChongZzZhang · 2026-09-03
- Why diffusion models will never get a Karpathy-style 2-hour tutorial — RisingSayak · 2026-09-03
- RSA-260 Factored, Setting a New World Record for General-Purpose Number Factorization — marvinvonhagen · 2026-09-03