Scholars debate: do AI rights presuppose AI consciousness? The premise doesn't hold
joshalbrecht · x · 2026-08-21
A reply thread unpacks a magazine cover asking "could AIs become consciousness." Seth Lazar objects to its implicit assumption that AI rights presuppose AI consciousness, noting the entailment fails both ways: AIs could be conscious without rights, and have rights without consciousness. Josh Albrecht counters that we roughly grant rights in proportion to sentience (cf. animal rights advocacy), and that the cover taking this for granted is itself evidence it's a common belief, pointing to a more nuanced annotated doc.
Related event: Scholars debate whether AI rights presuppose AI consciousness(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI Is Forcing Everyone Into Management—Until It Eats Middle Management Too — MonkZer0 · 2026-10-16
- Shogun 2 remaster review-bombed over AI-upscaled graphics, sparking dev debate — draginol · 2026-10-16
- Pedro Domingos: Everyone must have their own unique model, anything else is dangerous — pmddomingos · 2026-10-16
- Interp researcher pushes back: if you can't simulate a neuron, you haven't explained it — nabla_theta · 2026-10-16
- Will AI Discoveries Outpace Human Understanding? A 'Roadside Picnic' Analogy — infinitely_zero · 2026-10-16
- Virtue ethics meets AI alignment: what would it mean to make a model virtuous? — joelbot3000 · 2026-10-16