Reply says AI risk concerns are being driven by AGI-pilled thinking
ben_j_todd · x · 2026-07-25
A reply arguing that concern about AI risk is largely driven by people who are already “AGI-pilled.”
It quotes the earlier post about AI Futures’ “slow down” plan still implying around 90% annual GDP growth, using that contrast to suggest that even slowdown narratives are built on very strong AGI assumptions.
Related event: AI Futures Slowdown Path Assumes Massive Output(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- A real RSI test should reach today’s frontier LLM from scratch, the author argues — kchonyc · 2026-07-27
- New co-edited book on encounters with AI arrives in print — Merzmensch · 2026-07-27
- AlphaGo is used as a case study for how superhuman AI can still improve humans — _arohan_ · 2026-07-27
- Open-weight AI will be used for harm, says quote-tweet arguing bad actors always adapt — basedjensen · 2026-07-27
- ARC-AGI’s name may overstate what the benchmark can really tell us about AGI — tedgreenwald · 2026-07-27
- Joshua Saxe says a near-term international AI safety deal still looks hard as cyber risk rises — joshua_saxe · 2026-07-27